Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Publication Information:
      BMC, 2011.
    • Publication Date:
      2011
    • Collection:
      LCC:Medical technology
    • Abstract:
      Abstract Background Discomfort characterized by pain and warmth are common adverse effects associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media (CM). The objective of this review was to pool patient-reported outcomes available from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to compare the discomfort rates associated with iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM; i.e., iodixanol) to those reported with various low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). Methods A review of the literature published between 1990 and 2009 available through Medline, Medline Preprints, Embase, Biological Abstracts, BioBase, Cab Abstracts, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Life Sciences Collection, Inside Conferences, Energy Database, Engineering Index and Technology Collection was performed to compare rates of discomfort associated with the use of the IOCM (iodixanol) vs. various LOCM agents in head-to-head RCTs. All trials with a Jadad score ≥2 that reported patient discomfort data following intra-arterial administration of CM were reviewed, coded, and extracted. Results A total of 22 RCTs (n = 8087) were included. Overall discomfort (regardless of severity) was significantly different between patients receiving IOCM and various LOCMs (risk difference [RD] -0.049; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.076, -0.021; p = 0.001). IOCM was favored over all LOCMs combined with a summary RD value of -0.188 (95% CI: -0.265, -0.112; p < 0.001) for incidence of pain, regardless of severity. A greater reduction in the magnitude of pain was observed with IOCM (iodixanol), particularly with selective limb and carotid/intracerebral procedures. Similarly, the meta-analysis of warmth sensation, regardless of severity, favored IOCM over LOCMs with an RD of -0.043 (95% CI: -0.074, -0.011; p = 0.008). A positive linear relationship was observed between the discomfort effect size and age and a negative relationship with increasing proportion of women. The opposite trends were observed with warmth sensation. Conclusions IOCM was associated with less frequent and severe patient discomfort during intra-arterial administration. These data support differences in osmolality as a possible determinant of CM discomfort.
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      1471-2342
    • Relation:
      http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/11/12; https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2342
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/1471-2342-11-12
    • Rights:
      Journal Licence: CC BY
    • Accession Number:
      edsdoj.677f179939c4db8b225191de2a6bdb6
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      CAPASSO PATRIZIO; MCCULLOUGH PETER A. Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Medical Imaging, [s. l.], n. 1, p. 12, 2011. DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-11-12. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.677f179939c4db8b225191de2a6bdb6&custid=s8280428. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Capasso Patrizio, McCullough Peter A. Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Medical Imaging. 2011;(1):12. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-12.
    • APA:
      Capasso Patrizio, & McCullough Peter A. (2011). Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Medical Imaging, 1, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-11-12
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Capasso Patrizio, and McCullough Peter A. 2011. “Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-Arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials.” BMC Medical Imaging, no. 1: 12. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-12.
    • Harvard:
      Capasso Patrizio and McCullough Peter A (2011) ‘Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials’, BMC Medical Imaging, (1), p. 12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-11-12.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Capasso Patrizio & McCullough Peter A 2011, ‘Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials’, BMC Medical Imaging, no. 1, p. 12, viewed 9 April 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Capasso Patrizio, and McCullough Peter A. “Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-Arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials.” BMC Medical Imaging, no. 1, 2011, p. 12. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-12.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Capasso Patrizio, and McCullough Peter A. “Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-Arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials.” BMC Medical Imaging, no. 1 (2011): 12. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-12.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Capasso Patrizio, McCullough Peter A. Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Medical Imaging [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 Apr 9];(1):12. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.677f179939c4db8b225191de2a6bdb6&custid=s8280428