Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      EQ-5D-5L
      Minimum important difference
      Oxford hip and knee Scores
      Responsiveness
      Total joint replacement
      Validity
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: (1) To assess responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L compared to Oxford hip and knee scores and the SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement surgery; (2) to compare distribution and anchor-based methods of assessing responsiveness.Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to consecutive patients following surgeon referral for primary THR or TKR and 1 year post-surgery. We assessed effect size (ES), standardized response mean (SRM), and standard error of measurement (SEM). Minimum important difference (MID) was the mean change in patients reporting somewhat better in hip or knee, health in general, and those who were satisfied with surgery (5-point scales). Responders were compared using MID versus 1 and 2SEM.Results: The sample of 537 (50% TKR) was composed of 56% female with a mean age of 64 years (SD 10). EQ-5D-5L ES was 1.86 (THR) and 1.19 (TKR) compared to 3.00 and 2.05 for Oxford scores, respectively. MID for the EQ-5D-5L was 0.22 (THR) and 0.20 (TKR) for patients who rated their hip or knee as somewhat better. There was a wide variation in the MID and the percentage of responders, depending on the joint, method of assessment, and the outcome measure. The percent agreement of responder classification using 2SEM vs. MID ranged from 79.6 to 99.6% for the EQ-5D-5L and from 69.4 to 94.8% for the Oxford scores.Conclusions: Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L was acceptable in TKR and THR. Caution should be taken in interpreting responder to TJR based on only one method of assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3rd Floor, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, T2N 4Z6, Calgary, AB, Canada
      2Concordia Hip and Knee Institute, 310-1155 Concordia Avenue, R2K 2M9, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
      3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Suite 4822, B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, Canada
    • Full Text Word Count:
      8250
    • ISSN:
      0962-9343
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5
    • Accession Number:
      128968844
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      CONNER-SPADY, B. L. et al. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Quality of Life Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 5, p. 1311–1322, 2018. DOI 10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=128968844&custid=s8280428. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Noseworthy TW. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Quality of Life Research. 2018;27(5):1311-1322. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5.
    • APA:
      Conner-Spady, B. L., Marshall, D. A., Bohm, E., Dunbar, M. J., & Noseworthy, T. W. (2018). Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1311–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Conner-Spady, Barbara L., Deborah A. Marshall, Eric Bohm, Michael J. Dunbar, and Tom W. Noseworthy. 2018. “Comparing the Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and SF-12 in Osteoarthritis Patients 1 Year Following Total Joint Replacement.” Quality of Life Research 27 (5): 1311–22. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5.
    • Harvard:
      Conner-Spady, B. L. et al. (2018) ‘Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement’, Quality of Life Research, 27(5), pp. 1311–1322. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Conner-Spady, BL, Marshall, DA, Bohm, E, Dunbar, MJ & Noseworthy, TW 2018, ‘Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement’, Quality of Life Research, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1311–1322, viewed 26 February 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Conner-Spady, Barbara L., et al. “Comparing the Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and SF-12 in Osteoarthritis Patients 1 Year Following Total Joint Replacement.” Quality of Life Research, vol. 27, no. 5, May 2018, pp. 1311–1322. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Conner-Spady, Barbara L., Deborah A. Marshall, Eric Bohm, Michael J. Dunbar, and Tom W. Noseworthy. “Comparing the Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and SF-12 in Osteoarthritis Patients 1 Year Following Total Joint Replacement.” Quality of Life Research 27, no. 5 (May 2018): 1311–22. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Noseworthy TW. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Quality of Life Research [Internet]. 2018 May [cited 2020 Feb 26];27(5):1311–22. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=128968844&custid=s8280428